OutcomesResults
Measured against a baseline, not a memory.
Every patient here is scored on a validated instrument before treatment and again after it. That is the only way to know whether something worked — and the only way we are willing to make a claim about it.
01Method
How we measure.
At your first visit you complete the IIEF-5, a five-question instrument validated across decades of clinical research. It takes two minutes and produces a number between five and twenty-five. That number is your baseline, and it goes in your record.
At every follow-up you complete it again. Improvement is therefore a measured change rather than a recollection of how the last few weeks felt — which is important, because recollection at a follow-up appointment is unreliable in both directions.
Where treatment is vascular, we also repeat duplex imaging and compare peak systolic velocity directly. Where it is hormonal, we repeat the panel. The point is the same throughout: replace impressions with measurements.
If we cannot show you a number that moved, we have not shown you a result.
02 — Evidence
What the literature supports.
These are published population figures from the clinical literature, not claims about this clinic. Individual results depend on the mechanism driving your symptoms.
- ~70%
- Respond to oral therapy
- 70–90%
- Respond to injection therapy
- ~90%+
- Satisfaction after implant
- 12 mo
- Typical Li-ESWT durability
Across randomized trials of PDE5 inhibitors at therapeutic dose in men with mild to moderate ED.
Commonly cited response range for intracavernosal therapy, including in men who have failed oral treatment.
Patient and partner satisfaction with inflatable penile prostheses is the highest of any ED treatment studied.
Published follow-up for acoustic wave therapy generally shows benefit persisting one to two years, then regressing.
03A deliberate omission
Why there are no testimonials on this page.
Every competitor site in this field carries a row of quotations from grateful men. We have none, and the reason is not modesty.
A testimonial is selected. It is chosen from among the patients who did well, by the party being paid, and it is presented to a man who has no way of knowing how many other patients were not quoted. Whatever else it is, it is not evidence — and on a page titled “outcomes” that distinction matters.
There is a regulatory dimension too. Testimonials conveying results a typical patient should not expect are actionable as deceptive advertising, and a number of state medical boards restrict them for licensed practices outright.
What we will show you instead is your own number, measured before treatment and again after it. That is the only outcome claim that is actually about you.
04The other side
When a treatment does not work.
Some treatments fail. Acoustic wave therapy does not help every man who tries it. Platelet-rich plasma may not help anyone, which is why it carries the grade it carries. Even oral medication, at a genuine maximum dose, leaves a meaningful minority unimproved.
What we do about that is straightforward. We rescore you at a fixed interval, we compare it to your baseline, and if the number has not moved we say so plainly and change direction. We do not recommend a second course on the basis of hope, and we do not describe a null result as “early progress”.
This costs us revenue on a regular basis. It is also the only defensible way to run a clinic where the patient cannot easily verify what he is being told.
Next step
Start with a conversation, not a prescription.
Ninety minutes with a physician who does only this. A full diagnostic workup, a written plan, and a clear price before anything begins.